1. FedRAMP Compliance Help Center
  2. FedRAMP Compliance Framework
  3. Standards and Regulations (NIST SP 800-53, FIPS 199, FIPS 200)

FIPS 199

Understanding FIPS 199: Security Categorization and Impact Levels for Federal Information Systems

Standards and Regulations: FIPS 199

The Federal Risk and Authorization Management Program (FedRAMP) relies on several key standards and regulations to ensure the security and compliance of cloud services used by federal agencies. Among these, the Federal Information Processing Standard (FIPS) 199 plays a crucial role. This article explores FIPS 199, focusing on its guidelines for security categorization and impact levels, as well as the minimum security requirements for federal information systems.

Security Categorization and Impact Levels

Overview of FIPS 199

FIPS 199, titled "Standards for Security Categorization of Federal Information and Information Systems," was issued by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to provide a standardized approach for categorizing federal information and information systems. The primary goal of FIPS 199 is to promote the development of appropriate security controls based on the impact that potential security breaches could have on organizational operations, assets, and individuals.

Security Categories

FIPS 199 introduces three security objectives that must be protected to ensure the integrity, confidentiality, and availability of federal information systems. These objectives are:

  • Confidentiality: Ensuring that sensitive information is not disclosed to unauthorized individuals, entities, or processes.
  • Integrity: Guarding against improper information modification or destruction, ensuring information authenticity and accuracy.
  • Availability: Ensuring timely and reliable access to and use of information.

Impact Levels

Each security objective is associated with three potential impact levels: low, moderate, and high. These impact levels help determine the severity of potential consequences resulting from a security breach.

  • Low Impact: The loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability could have a limited adverse effect on organizational operations, organizational assets, or individuals. Limited effects might include minor damage to organizational assets or minor financial loss.
  • Moderate Impact: The loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability could have a serious adverse effect on organizational operations, organizational assets, or individuals. Serious effects might include significant damage to organizational assets, significant financial loss, or significant harm to individuals.
  • High Impact: The loss of confidentiality, integrity, or availability could have a severe or catastrophic adverse effect on organizational operations, organizational assets, or individuals. Severe effects might include major damage to organizational assets, major financial loss, or severe or catastrophic harm to individuals, including loss of life or serious life-threatening injuries.

The process of security categorization involves determining the appropriate impact level for each of the security objectives based on the type of information and the system's function. This categorization is critical for selecting and implementing the appropriate security controls.

Minimum Security Requirements for Federal Information Systems

Establishing Baselines

Based on the security categorization and impact levels determined through FIPS 199, federal information systems must implement a set of minimum security requirements. These requirements are derived from NIST Special Publication 800-53, which provides a catalog of security controls.

  • Low-Impact Systems: For information systems categorized with a low impact level, the minimum security requirements focus on basic security measures to protect against minor threats. These might include basic access controls, simple encryption methods, and regular system updates.
  • Moderate-Impact Systems: Moderate-impact systems require more comprehensive security measures to protect against more significant threats. These systems must implement a broader set of controls, including enhanced access controls, stronger encryption techniques, and more rigorous incident response protocols. Continuous monitoring and more frequent security assessments are also necessary for these systems.
  • High-Impact Systems: High-impact systems, given the severe consequences of potential breaches, require the most stringent security controls. These systems must implement advanced security measures, such as multi-factor authentication, robust encryption, detailed auditing and logging, and continuous security monitoring. High-impact systems also need comprehensive contingency planning to ensure rapid recovery in the event of a security incident.

Implementing FIPS 199 in FedRAMP

FedRAMP incorporates FIPS 199 standards into its compliance framework to ensure that cloud services used by federal agencies meet the required security levels based on their impact categorization. By aligning with FIPS 199, FedRAMP ensures that the security controls implemented by CSPs are appropriate for the level of risk associated with the federal information and systems they handle.

Conclusion

FIPS 199 is a fundamental component of the FedRAMP compliance framework, providing a standardized approach for categorizing the security needs of federal information systems. By establishing clear security categories and impact levels, FIPS 199 helps federal agencies and CSPs implement appropriate security controls to protect against potential threats. This standardized approach enhances the overall security posture of federal IT systems and ensures that sensitive information is safeguarded effectively.